76ers vs Detroit Pistons Match Player Stats: In-Depth Game Overview

Introduction

This article breaks down the 76ers vs Detroit Pistons match player stats from their November 14, 2025 meeting, using only official NBA box score data. Every key contributor is covered to show how Detroit’s balanced execution outperformed Philadelphia’s individual scoring.

With these teams set to meet again on Friday, March 13, 2026, this matchup now serves as the latest performance reference for fans tracking form, rotations, and matchup trends.

Match Overview & Final Score

In this latest encounter, the Detroit Pistons defeated the Philadelphia 76ers 114–105 after maintaining control through efficient offense and disciplined execution. Detroit consistently responded to Philadelphia’s scoring runs, preventing the 76ers from building sustained momentum at any point.

Philadelphia showed flashes of competitiveness behind strong guard play, but Detroit’s ability to generate points from multiple positions ultimately created the separation needed to close out the game comfortably.

Philadelphia 76ers Key Players

1. Tyrese Maxey

Maxey led the 76ers offensively, taking charge of scoring and facilitating plays throughout the game. His aggressive drives and perimeter shooting kept Philadelphia competitive in critical moments.

• Points: 31
• Rebounds: 7
• Assists: 3

Maxey’s ability to attack off the dribble and create open shots for teammates highlighted his role as the primary scorer and playmaker for the Sixers. His energy on both ends of the court was crucial, especially during tight stretches in the fourth quarter.

2. VJ Edgecombe

Edgecombe contributed significantly with his shooting efficiency and floor spacing, helping stretch the Pistons’ defense.

• Points: 18
• Rebounds: 7
• Assists: 3

His three-point shooting and defensive presence allowed Philadelphia to maintain offensive balance, complementing Maxey’s aggressive style.

3. Andre Drummond

Drummond anchored the paint for the Sixers, combining scoring with elite rebounding to control the interior.

• Points: 12
• Rebounds: 11
• Assists: 2

Drummond’s presence inside made it difficult for the Pistons to get easy baskets near the rim. His defensive timing and rebounding discipline were vital in limiting second-chance points.

4. Quentin Grimes

Grimes provided scoring bursts and secondary playmaking, helping Philadelphia stay within reach throughout the game.

• Points: 9
• Rebounds: 1
• Assists: 5

Grimes’ versatility allowed him to switch between perimeter shooting and facilitating ball movement, offering depth behind the starters.

5. Dominick Barlow

Barlow added an efficient scoring touch off the bench, contributing key points in limited minutes.

• Points: 10
• Rebounds: 8
• Assists: 3

His balanced performance was crucial in maintaining competitiveness when starters rested, emphasizing the Sixers’ depth.

Fans looking to compare performances can also explore how Philadelphia performed in the previous Denver Nuggets vs 76ers match player stats, which revealed a very different game flow and outcome.

Detroit Pistons Key Players and Stats

1. Daniss Jenkins

Jenkins led the Pistons offensively with steady scoring and floor vision, ensuring Detroit stayed in the game during critical stretches.

• Points: 19
• Rebounds: 3
• Assists: 8

His decision-making in transition and ability to convert mid-range shots kept Detroit offensively balanced. Jenkins’ court awareness also helped distribute the ball effectively to teammates.

2. Javonte Green

Green combined perimeter shooting with inside aggression, contributing consistently on both ends.

• Points: 21
• Rebounds: 9
• Assists: 3

Green’s hustle and ability to attack gaps in the Sixers’ defense made him a dual-threat, while his defensive plays limited Philadelphia’s scoring opportunities.

3. Isaiah Stewart

Stewart dominated the paint with scoring efficiency and rebounding dominance.

• Points: 14
• Rebounds: 7
• Assists: 1

His interior presence provided stability for Detroit, preventing easy baskets and creating second-chance opportunities.

4. Caris LeVert

LeVert was a scoring spark and perimeter threat, stretching the Sixers’ defense and creating spacing for teammates.

• Points: 14
• Rebounds: 2
• Assists: 6

His sharpshooting from deep and ability to handle the ball under pressure were pivotal in keeping the Pistons competitive.

5. Duncan Robinson

Robinson contributed efficiently from beyond the arc, adding spacing and quick scoring opportunities.

• Points: 15
• Rebounds: 6
• Assists: 3

His floor spacing allowed Detroit to diversify their offensive sets and prevented the Sixers from collapsing too much on the paint.

Team Stats Comparison

The overall team statistics explain why Detroit maintained control despite Philadelphia’s individual scoring efforts. Detroit’s efficiency, ball movement, and rebounding balance proved decisive across four quarters.

Detroit’s ability to spread scoring and limit mistakes allowed them to absorb Philadelphia’s scoring runs without losing structure or rhythm.

Key Player Comparison

This matchup highlighted a contrast between individual dominance and collective execution. Philadelphia leaned heavily on one primary scorer, while Detroit benefited from multiple contributors.

Detroit’s depth allowed them to respond consistently whenever Philadelphia threatened to shift momentum. From a broader NBA match player stats perspective, this game showed how controlled execution often beats isolation-heavy scoring.

76ers vs Detroit Pistons Match Timeline & Momentum Shifts

The game opened with both teams trading early baskets, but Detroit quickly established a steady tempo. Their offense emphasized spacing and quick ball movement, preventing Philadelphia from loading up defensively on one scorer.

Philadelphia responded with aggressive guard play, briefly narrowing the gap during the second quarter. However, Detroit answered with timely perimeter shooting and inside finishes, regaining control before halftime.

The second half followed a similar pattern. Each Philadelphia push was met by a composed Detroit response, with the Pistons repeatedly halting momentum through smart shot selection. By the final quarter, Detroit’s consistency made it difficult for the 76ers to mount a sustained comeback.

Offensive & Defensive Performance Breakdown

Offensively, Detroit executed with balance and patience. Rather than forcing isolation plays, they relied on ball movement to generate open looks. This approach kept defenders rotating and reduced the pressure on any single scorer to carry the offense.

Defensively, the Pistons focused on limiting easy transition points and contested shots late in possessions. While Maxey still found ways to score, Detroit forced tougher looks and avoided breakdowns that could have swung the game.

Philadelphia’s offense revolved around quick creation and individual shot-making. Although effective in stretches, the lack of consistent off-ball movement made it easier for Detroit to anticipate plays and recover defensively.

Coaching & Tactical Decisions

Detroit’s coaching staff emphasized rotation discipline and trust in role players. Keeping multiple scoring threats active prevented Philadelphia from exploiting defensive mismatches or fatigue late in the game.

Philadelphia adjusted by increasing pace and attacking early in the shot clock. While this created scoring opportunities, it also led to rushed possessions that benefited Detroit’s defensive structure.

The contrast in tactical execution became clearer as the game progressed, with Detroit maintaining composure while Philadelphia struggled to convert urgency into efficiency.

Defining Plays & Momentum Control

Detroit’s control over key moments separated this game from being a late-night toss-up. Whenever Philadelphia narrowed the gap, the Pistons responded with composed possessions instead of forcing shots. This steady approach prevented momentum from swinging fully in the 76ers’ favor.

The most decisive stretch came late, when Detroit slowed the pace and executed half-court sets cleanly. Smart spacing and disciplined shot selection forced Philadelphia into tougher defensive reads, allowing Detroit to protect its lead without relying on rushed offense.

On-Court Impact Beyond the Box Score

Detroit’s players influenced the game in ways that extended beyond scoring totals. Physical defense, off-ball movement, and timely positioning allowed them to control space and limit second-chance opportunities. This collective effort kept Philadelphia from building extended scoring runs.

Philadelphia’s impact leaned more toward individual creation. While their primary scorer consistently applied pressure, the lack of synchronized off-ball movement made it easier for Detroit to recover defensively. The contrast highlighted the Pistons’ stronger team cohesion.

Tactical Execution & Coaching Influence

Detroit’s coaching approach emphasized patience and trust in the rotation. Players were encouraged to stay within their roles, resulting in fewer forced possessions and better late-game balance. That structure helped maintain control during high-pressure moments.

Philadelphia attempted to increase tempo to disrupt Detroit’s rhythm. While this approach created brief opportunities, it also led to hurried possessions that played into Detroit’s defensive organization. Execution, rather than adjustment, became the deciding factor.

What This Match Signals Going Forward

For Detroit, this win reinforces the importance of balanced contributions and disciplined execution. The ability to manage pressure situations without relying on a single offensive option strengthens confidence moving ahead.

Philadelphia leaves the matchup with clear takeaways. Individual talent remains a strength, but late-game consistency and collective execution will be crucial in similar matchups against structured opponents.

What this Game Tells Us Before the March 13, 2026 Rematch

From an offensive angle, Detroit’s ability to spread scoring across multiple players made their attack more stable than Philadelphia’s guard-heavy approach. That balance allowed the Pistons to respond calmly whenever pressure increased.

Defensively, Detroit’s structured half-court coverage limited clean looks late, forcing tougher possessions. With another meeting coming on March 13, 2026, these match player stats remain the clearest indicator of how this matchup currently leans.

FAQs – 76ers vs Detroit Pistons Match Player Stats

Final Thoughts

The Philadelphia Detroit Pistons vs 76ers match player stats tell a story of structure over reliance. Detroit’s ability to control tempo, trust multiple contributors, and execute under pressure defined the outcome.

Philadelphia showed individual brilliance, but this matchup emphasized that sustained success depends on collective rhythm and late-game discipline. It was a clear example of how controlled basketball often wins close contests.