Milwaukee Bucks vs Cleveland Cavaliers Match Player Stats (March 17, 2026)

Game Overview & Final Score Recap
The Milwaukee Bucks vs Cleveland Cavaliers match player stats tell the story of a fast-paced and high-scoring battle at Fiserv Forum. It felt like a playoff-type contest, with both teams trading momentum swings across all four quarters.
In the end, the Cleveland Cavaliers pulled away late to secure a 123–116 win over the Milwaukee Bucks. A dominant fourth quarter from Cleveland made the difference, as they executed better under pressure and closed the game with authority.
Match Information
- Date & Day: Tuesday, March 17th, 2026
- Time: 5:00 AM
- Venue: Fiserv Forum, Milwaukee, WI
- Officials: Nick Buchert, Karl Lane, Nate Green
- Attendance: 16,341
- Final Score: Cleveland Cavaliers 123 – 116 Milwaukee Bucks
Team Performance & Match Insights
Cleveland Cavaliers – Strong Finish Seals the Win
Cleveland came into this matchup with clear intent, and their offensive rhythm showed early. They shot an efficient 48.8% from the field and did a great job attacking inside, especially through Evan Mobley’s presence in the paint. Even though Donovan Mitchell struggled with shooting, the team found scoring from multiple options.
The real turning point was the fourth quarter, where Cleveland exploded for 38 points. Ball movement (27 assists) and control (just 6 turnovers) helped them maintain composure late.
Milwaukee Bucks – Good Fight but Missed Chances
Milwaukee had strong moments, especially in the second quarter where they outscored Cleveland 34–20. Their three-point shooting (44.4%) kept them in the game, with players like Ousmane Dieng and Bobby Portis stepping up offensively.
However, defensive lapses and rebounding gaps hurt them late. The Bucks allowed too many second-chance opportunities and couldn’t contain Cleveland’s late surge. Despite solid individual efforts, the team lacked consistency in key moments, something also reflected in other bold Milwaukee Bucks game breakdowns.
Quarter By Quarter Breakdown
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLE | 37 | 20 | 28 | 38 | 123 |
| MIL | 24 | 34 | 29 | 29 | 116 |
Individual Player Stats & Key Contributions
This section highlights the complete Milwaukee Bucks vs Cleveland Cavaliers match player stats, focusing on individual performances. From star players to role contributors, every stat below is taken directly from the official box score to ensure full accuracy.
Cleveland Cavaliers Player Stats
| Player | Pos | PTS | MIN | FGM | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | OREB | DREB | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | PF | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evan Mobley | C | 27 | 32:58 | 12 | 21 | 57.1 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 3 | 5 | 60.0 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| James Harden | G | 27 | 33:30 | 7 | 10 | 70.0 | 2 | 4 | 50.0 | 11 | 13 | 84.6 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 17 |
| Donovan Mitchell | G | 19 | 33:53 | 4 | 14 | 28.6 | 1 | 4 | 25.0 | 10 | 13 | 76.9 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -15 |
| Sam Merrill | F | 17 | 28:02 | 6 | 12 | 50.0 | 3 | 8 | 37.5 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 22 |
| Dean Wade | F | 9 | 24:52 | 4 | 8 | 50.0 | 1 | 4 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 |
| Keon Ellis | G | 8 | 24:17 | 3 | 4 | 75.0 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
| Max Strus | F | 6 | 23:06 | 2 | 6 | 33.3 | 2 | 6 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 |
| Thomas Bryant | C | 5 | 10:19 | 2 | 4 | 50.0 | 1 | 3 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -5 |
| Dennis Schröder | G | 3 | 15:51 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -8 |
| Jaylon Tyson | F | 2 | 13:12 | 1 | 5 | 20.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -5 |
Bench Impact – Cavaliers
Cleveland’s bench gave steady support, especially through Keon Ellis and Max Strus, who added spacing and hustle plays. The second unit kept the tempo alive and didn’t let the lead slip, which proved vital in the closing minutes.
You May have missed: Miami Heat vs Cleveland Cavaliers Match Player Stats
Milwaukee Bucks Player Stats
| Player | Pos | PTS | MIN | FGM | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | OREB | DREB | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | PF | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin Porter Jr. | G | 25 | 32:33 | 8 | 15 | 53.3 | 1 | 4 | 25.0 | 8 | 8 | 100 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -9 |
| Ryan Rollins | G | 19 | 33:51 | 6 | 13 | 46.2 | 3 | 7 | 42.9 | 4 | 4 | 100 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | -5 |
| Ousmane Dieng | F | 19 | 29:44 | 7 | 12 | 58.3 | 5 | 8 | 62.5 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Bobby Portis | F | 19 | 32:44 | 8 | 19 | 42.1 | 3 | 7 | 42.9 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| Pete Nance | F | 13 | 29:40 | 5 | 6 | 83.3 | 3 | 4 | 75.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Taurean Prince | F | 8 | 22:37 | 3 | 7 | 42.9 | 2 | 4 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | -20 |
| AJ Green | G | 6 | 26:03 | 2 | 7 | 28.6 | 2 | 7 | 28.6 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Jericho Sims | C | 4 | 15:57 | 2 | 3 | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | -18 |
| Kyle Kuzma | F | 3 | 16:51 | 1 | 6 | 16.7 | 1 | 4 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -6 |
Bench Analysis – Bucks
Milwaukee’s bench had flashes of scoring, especially from Ousmane Dieng and Pete Nance. However, defensive inconsistency and lack of control in key stretches limited their overall impact late in the game.
Match Stats Comparison
| Category | Cavaliers | Bucks |
|---|---|---|
| Field Goal % | 48.8% | 47.7% |
| 3-Point % | 33.3% | 44.4% |
| Free Throw % | 79.4% | 70.6% |
| Total Rebounds | 46 | 39 |
| Assists | 27 | 24 |
| Turnovers | 6 | 8 |
| Blocks | 4 | 6 |
| Steals | 3 | 3 |
| Personal Fouls | 20 | 22 |
| Points | 123 | 116 |
Cleveland had the edge in efficiency, rebounding, and ball control. Even though Milwaukee shot better from deep, the Cavaliers’ inside dominance and free-throw accuracy made the difference in the final outcome.
Injury Report
| Team | Player | Position | Status | Injury | Expected Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | Myles Turner | C | Day-To-Day | Calf – Strain | 2026-03-19 |
| MIL | Giannis Antetokounmpo | F | Out | Knee – Bruise | 2026-03-28 |
| CLE | Tyrese Proctor | G | Out | Quadriceps – Strain | 2026-03-24 |
| CLE | Craig Porter Jr. | G | Out | Groin – Strain | 2026-03-24 |
| CLE | Jarrett Allen | C | Out | Knee – Tendinitis | 2026-03-24 |
Milwaukee Bucks vs Cleveland Cavaliers Match Stats PDF
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who was the top scorer in the game?
Evan Mobley and James Harden both led the Cavaliers with 27 points each, playing a key role in securing the win.
2. What was the final score of the game?
The Cleveland Cavaliers defeated the Milwaukee Bucks 123–116.
3. Which team performed better in the fourth quarter?
Cleveland dominated the fourth quarter, scoring 38 points to close the game strongly.
4. How did Donovan Mitchell perform?
Mitchell scored 19 points but struggled with shooting efficiency, hitting just 4 of 14 field goals.
5. Who led the Bucks in scoring?
Kevin Porter Jr. led Milwaukee with 25 points along with an impressive 10 assists.
6. What was the key difference in the match?
Rebounding and fewer turnovers gave Cleveland a crucial advantage in the game.
7. How many rebounds did Evan Mobley grab?
Mobley recorded a dominant 15 rebounds along with his 27 points.
8. Did the Bucks shoot well from three-point range?
Yes, Milwaukee shot 44.4% from beyond the arc, outperforming Cleveland in that category.
Final Thoughts
The Milwaukee Bucks vs Cleveland Cavaliers match player stats highlight a well-fought contest where execution mattered most. Cleveland’s balanced scoring and strong finish proved decisive.
Milwaukee showed promise, especially offensively, but couldn’t sustain momentum late. If these two teams meet again, it could easily turn into another high-intensity battle.










