Charlotte Hornets vs Chicago Bulls Match Player Stats – Feb 24, 2026 Breakdown

Game Introduction – A Statement Night in Chicago
The February 24, 2026 showdown between the Charlotte Hornets and the Chicago Bulls unfolded as a statement performance. Under the bright lights of the United Center, Charlotte dictated the tempo with confidence and control. Crisp ball movement, relentless pace, and deadly accuracy from beyond the arc set the tone early, as the Hornets turned an away game into their own showcase from the very first possession.
This latest matchup drew 19,145 fans in Chicago, IL, and what they witnessed was a dominant road performance. Charlotte controlled pace, spacing, and defensive pressure, delivering one of their most efficient offensive games of the season.
Match Snapshot: Hornets Dominate at United Center
The Charlotte Hornets defeated the Chicago Bulls 131–99 on Tuesday night at United Center. Charlotte shot 51.6% from the field and knocked down 25 three-pointers, while Chicago struggled at 42.7% shooting and committed 19 turnovers. The Hornets also won the rebounding battle 46–33 and finished with a +32 team differential.
From a tactical standpoint, this was about execution. Charlotte moved the ball for 31 assists and forced mistakes that turned into easy transition points. Chicago had moments, especially from Matas Buzelis, but they never found consistent rhythm.
How Both Teams Performed on the Floor
Charlotte Hornets – Efficient, Unselfish, Relentless
Charlotte played with balance. Five players scored in double figures, and the spacing created open looks all night. They finished with 49 made field goals and 25 made threes on 57 attempts — elite volume and accuracy.
Defensively, the Hornets recorded 13 steals and 8 blocks. Their interior presence and passing lanes disrupted Chicago’s offensive flow. Watching live, you could see how connected they were on rotations.
Chicago Bulls – Bright Spot in a Tough Night
Chicago struggled early and never fully recovered. They scored 99 points on 35 made shots and managed only 18 assists as a team. Turnovers hurt them, especially against Charlotte’s active perimeter defense.
Still, Matas Buzelis delivered an impressive scoring performance. Patrick Williams shot efficiently, but overall, the Bulls could not match Charlotte’s pace or shot-making depth.
Charlotte Hornets Top Players Stats
1. Brandon Miller
Stats
- Points: 23
- Rebounds: 5
- Assists: 3
- Steals: 2
- Blocks: 1
- Turnovers: 6
- Plus/Minus: +16
Performance Insights:
Miller attacked confidently and stretched the defense with five three-pointers. His shot selection was aggressive yet controlled. Even with six turnovers, his scoring burst helped Charlotte build separation in the second half.

2. Kon Knueppel
Stats
- Points: 21
- Rebounds: 1
- Assists: 2
- Steals: 2
- Blocks: 0
- Turnovers: 0
- Plus/Minus: +24
Performance Insights:
Knueppel was clinical. He shot 7-for-12 and hit three triples while staying mistake-free with zero turnovers. His +24 impact showed how valuable his spacing and timely scoring were throughout the night.
3. Miles Bridges
Stats
- Points: 16
- Rebounds: 7
- Assists: 2
- Steals: 2
- Blocks: 1
- Turnovers: 2
- Plus/Minus: +19
Performance Insights:
Bridges gave Charlotte physicality and shot-making. He hit four three-pointers and added seven boards. His two-way presence helped maintain momentum whenever Chicago tried to push back.
4. LaMelo Ball
Stats
- Points: 16
- Rebounds: 3
- Assists: 7
- Steals: 1
- Blocks: 0
- Turnovers: 2
- Plus/Minus: +31
Performance Insights:
Ball controlled tempo. His seven assists kept the offense flowing, and his +31 was the highest on the team. Even with modest shooting efficiency, his playmaking defined the game’s rhythm.
5. Josh Green
Stats
- Points: 11
- Rebounds: 4
- Assists: 0
- Steals: 0
- Blocks: 0
- Turnovers: 1
- Plus/Minus: +21
Performance Insights:
Green provided energy off the bench. He shot 4-for-6 and hit three of five from deep. His spacing and defensive hustle helped Charlotte extend their lead in key stretches.
Hornets’ Second Unit Impact
Charlotte’s depth was a major factor. Coby White added 10 points and 4 assists, Grant Williams scored 11 with perfect free throws (3-for-3), and Tre Mann chipped in 7 points in limited minutes. The second unit maintained intensity and prevented any Bulls comeback.
For more detailed breakdowns like this, visit NBA Stats Time (interlink – homepage), where full game analysis and updated numbers are tracked consistently.
Chicago Bulls Top Players Stats
1. Matas Buzelis
Stats
- Points: 32
- Rebounds: 7
- Assists: 2
- Steals: 1
- Blocks: 0
- Turnovers: 2
- Plus/Minus: -7
Performance Insights:
Matas Buzelis was the lone offensive engine for Chicago. He shot 13-for-19 from the field and buried six threes, attacking closeouts with confidence. Despite the loss, his scoring efficiency kept the Bulls within reach for stretches.
2. Patrick Williams
Stats
- Points: 11
- Rebounds: 2
- Assists: 1
- Steals: 0
- Blocks: 0
- Turnovers: 4
- Plus/Minus: -4
Performance Insights:
Williams shot efficiently at 4-for-6 and hit three triples. However, four turnovers disrupted momentum. He showed scoring touch but struggled when pressured by Charlotte’s perimeter defense.
3. Guerschon Yabusele
Stats
- Points: 11
- Rebounds: 4
- Assists: 1
- Steals: 2
- Blocks: 0
- Turnovers: 1
- Plus/Minus: -9
Performance Insights:
Yabusele stretched the floor with three made threes and competed on the glass. His two steals highlighted defensive effort, but Chicago needed more interior resistance to counter Charlotte’s flow.
4. Collin Sexton
Stats
- Points: 10
- Rebounds: 2
- Assists: 1
- Steals: 2
- Blocks: 0
- Turnovers: 2
- Plus/Minus: -16
Performance Insights:
Sexton played with pace and attacked gaps, scoring 10 points on 4-for-9 shooting. His two steals showed defensive activity, yet the team struggled to convert stops into sustained runs.
5. Josh Giddey
Stats
- Points: 8
- Rebounds: 2
- Assists: 5
- Steals: 2
- Blocks: 0
- Turnovers: 5
- Plus/Minus: -22
Performance Insights:
Giddey facilitated with five assists and applied defensive pressure with two steals. However, five turnovers proved costly against a Hornets team that capitalized quickly in transition.
Chicago Bulls’ Second Unit Impact
Chicago’s bench had mixed impact. Rob Dillingham contributed 6 points and 5 assists, while Nick Richards added 6 points and 5 rebounds inside. Leonard Miller was efficient in limited minutes with 5 points on 2-for-2 shooting. Still, the overall bench production could not offset Charlotte’s scoring depth.
For readers analyzing similar breakdowns like the recent Bulls matchup trends and scoring patterns, the difference often comes down to ball security and defensive rotations — both areas where Chicago struggled in this contest.
Hornets vs Bulls: Key Stats Overview
| Category | Charlotte Hornets | Chicago Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| Field Goals | 49-95 (51.6%) | 35-82 (42.7%) |
| 3-Point Shooting | 25-57 (43.9%) | 16-40 (40.0%) |
| Free Throws | 8-9 (88.9%) | 13-15 (86.7%) |
| Total Rebounds | 46 | 33 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 14 | 9 |
| Assists | 31 | 18 |
| Steals | 13 | 9 |
| Blocks | 8 | 1 |
| Turnovers | 16 | 19 |
| Personal Fouls | 14 | 12 |
| Total Points | 131 | 99 |
Charlotte clearly won the efficiency battle. Their 25 made threes and 31 assists reflected superior spacing and teamwork. Chicago’s 19 turnovers and limited rim protection (only one block) made it difficult to slow down the Hornets’ offensive rhythm.
This statistical gap explains the 32-point final margin and reinforces why the Hornets vs Chicago Bulls Match Stats from this game highlight execution as the defining factor.
Turning Points in the Bulls vs Hornets Match

First Quarter
Charlotte came out aggressive, hitting 13 of 20 field goals and 7 threes. Their defensive pressure forced early Bulls turnovers, giving Charlotte an early 15-point lead. The Hornets’ ability to convert fast breaks immediately set the tone.
Second Quarter
Chicago tried to adjust, with Matas Buzelis scoring efficiently, but Hornets’ ball movement and shooting consistency kept the lead double digits. Charlotte’s interior presence and perimeter defense limited Bulls’ scoring opportunities.
Third Quarter
Charlotte extended the lead further, capitalizing on Chicago’s mistakes. Brandon Miller and Kon Knueppel knocked down multiple triples, while LaMelo Ball orchestrated seamless offensive sets, keeping the Bulls scrambling.
Fourth Quarter
Charlotte maintained control, rotating key bench players to sustain intensity. Despite Buzelis’ scoring effort, Chicago could not mount a comeback. The Hornets closed the game confidently with a 32-point advantage.
Strategic Highlights & Observations
- Charlotte’s three-point shooting (25/57) and ball movement (31 assists) were decisive in dominating the Bulls.
- Hornets’ bench contributed efficiently, keeping momentum when starters rested.
- Chicago struggled with turnovers (19) and interior defense (1 block), which Charlotte exploited consistently.
- Matas Buzelis was a bright spot for the Bulls, scoring 32 points but receiving little support.
- LaMelo Ball’s playmaking (+31 impact) ensured Hornets controlled the game pace from start to finish.
Charlotte Hornets vs Chicago Bulls Timeline
- November 28, 2025: Charlotte Hornets 123 – 116 Chicago Bulls.
- Location: Spectrum Center, Charlotte, NC.
- Highlight: Brandon Miller led the Hornets with 27 points to secure the first win of the series.
- December 12, 2025: Chicago Bulls 129 – 126 Charlotte Hornets.
- Location: Spectrum Center, Charlotte, NC.
- Highlight: The Bulls’ Kon Knueppel dropped 33 points in a high-scoring battle to give Chicago their only win of the series.
- January 3, 2026: Charlotte Hornets 112 – 99 Chicago Bulls.
- Location: United Center, Chicago, IL.
- Highlight: Miles Bridges powered the Hornets with 26 points as Charlotte reclaimed the series lead on the road.
- February 24, 2026: Charlotte Hornets 131 – 99 Chicago Bulls.
- Location: United Center, Chicago, IL.
- Highlight: In the series finale, LaMelo Ball exploded for 37 points, leading Charlotte to a blowout 32-point victory to finish the season series 3–1.
Earlier Meeting Recap: Hornets and Bulls (Jan 3, 2026)
In their prior meeting on Saturday, January 3, 2026, the Charlotte Hornets defeated the Chicago Bulls 112–99 at United Center, Chicago, IL. Charlotte’s offense dominated with strong three-point shooting and efficient ball movement, while Bulls failed to respond effectively. This performance highlighted a similar trend in scoring depth and perimeter dominance.
FAQs
Q1: Who led scoring for the Hornets on Feb 24, 2026?
Brandon Miller led Charlotte with 23 points, including five three-pointers and efficient overall shooting.
Q2: How did LaMelo Ball perform in this match?
Ball scored 16 points, dished out 7 assists, and contributed +31 in plus/minus, controlling Hornets’ offense effectively.
Q3: What was the attendance at United Center?
The game drew 19,145 fans, witnessing a decisive Hornets victory.
Q4: How did Chicago’s turnovers affect the game?
Bulls committed 19 turnovers, giving Charlotte numerous transition points, contributing significantly to the 32-point loss.
Q5: Which Bulls player scored the most points?
Matas Buzelis scored 32 points, including six three-pointers, and was Chicago’s primary offensive threat.
Q6: How did Charlotte perform from three-point range?
The Hornets shot 43.9% from beyond the arc, making 25 threes on 57 attempts, crucial for building an early lead.
Q7: Did bench players impact the Hornets’ victory?
Yes, players like Coby White and Grant Williams contributed points and maintained momentum when starters rested.
Q8: How does this match compare to the previous meeting in January 2026?
Both games showed Charlotte’s dominance in perimeter shooting and offensive execution, resulting in large margin victories over the Bulls.
Final Thoughts
The Charlotte Hornets’ dominant win over the Chicago Bulls was built on superior shooting, precise ball movement, and depth contributions. With both starters and bench performing efficiently, Charlotte reinforced its reputation as a team to watch in the 2026 NBA season. The Bulls showed flashes of individual brilliance but lacked consistency and defensive presence.









