knicks vs Chicago Bulls Match Player Stats (April 3rd, 2026)
New York Dominates MSG
The New York Knicks delivered a masterclass performance at Madison Square Garden, leaving the Chicago Bulls struggling to keep pace. Fans witnessed a high-energy showdown where the Knicks’ offensive depth proved too much for Chicago’s defense. This Knicks vs Chicago Bulls Match Player Stats report provides a complete breakdown of the action from this April 2026 clash.
Match Information
| Category | Details |
| Date & Day | Friday, April 3rd, 2026 |
| Time | 4:30 AM |
| Venue | Madison Square Garden, New York, NY |
| Officials | Scott Foster, John Butler, Pat O’Connell |
| Attendance | 19,812 |
| Final Score | Bulls 96, Knicks 136 |
Knicks Overpower Bulls in Clinical Performance
New York started the game with incredible intensity, quickly building a lead that Chicago could never bridge. The Knicks’ ball movement and perimeter shooting were elite, keeping the Madison Square Garden crowd on their feet. NBA Match Analysis shows that the Knicks’ defensive pressure forced multiple turnovers, leading to easy fast-break points.
Chicago struggled to find their rhythm early in the game, often settling for tough contested shots. While the Bulls showed flashes of resilience in the third quarter, they lacked the consistent scoring needed to challenge New York. The final score of 136-96 reflects a game where the Knicks controlled every major statistical category from start to finish.
New York’s Tactical Masterclass
The Knicks played like a well-oiled machine, with OG Anunoby and Jalen Brunson leading the charge. Their ability to find open teammates and exploit mismatches allowed them to maintain a high field goal percentage throughout the night. It felt like every New York player who stepped on the court contributed to the scoring barrage.
Chicago’s Uphill Battle
For the Bulls, the night was defined by missed opportunities and defensive lapses. Despite some solid individual efforts from the bench, the starting unit couldn’t contain New York’s versatile wing players. This performance highlights the areas where Chicago needs more consistency to compete with the Eastern Conference elite in the updated 2026 NBA standings.
Quarter By Quarter Breakdown
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| CHI | 16 | 25 | 31 | 24 | 96 |
| NYK | 38 | 40 | 30 | 28 | 136 |
Individual Player Performance Breakdowns
The Madison Square Garden crowd witnessed an absolute clinic as the home team displayed incredible depth and precision. While the starters set the tone early, the rotational players ensured the lead never slipped in this Knicks vs Chicago Bulls Match Player Stats showdown.
New York Knicks Player Stats
The Knicks’ efficiency was off the charts, particularly from the starters who moved the ball with professional-grade vision. Here are the detailed figures for every player who took the court in this dominant victory:
| Player | POS | PTS | MIN | FGM | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | OREB | DREB | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | PF | +/- |
| OG Anunoby | F | 31 | 30:30 | 9 | 15 | 60.0 | 7 | 10 | 70.0 | 6 | 6 | 100 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 32 |
| Jalen Brunson | G | 17 | 29:51 | 6 | 13 | 46.2 | 1 | 4 | 25.0 | 4 | 4 | 100 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 25 |
| M. Robinson | C | 17 | 22:56 | 7 | 7 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 4 | 75.0 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 13 |
| Mikal Bridges | G | 12 | 22:41 | 4 | 12 | 33.3 | 0 | 5 | 0.0 | 4 | 4 | 100 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 |
| Tyler Kolek | G | 8 | 12:00 | 3 | 6 | 50.0 | 2 | 3 | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Landry Shamet | G | 8 | 12:41 | 3 | 7 | 42.9 | 2 | 4 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12 |
| Jeremy Sochan | F | 7 | 16:53 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 4 | 75.0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 30 |
| Josh Hart | F | 7 | 28:12 | 3 | 5 | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 1 | 10 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 30 |
| Miles McBride | G | 6 | 12:42 | 2 | 4 | 50.0 | 2 | 4 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 |
| M. Diawara | F | 6 | 12:18 | 2 | 4 | 50.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Ariel Hukporti | C | 6 | 8:11 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -3 |
| Pacôme Dadiet | F | 5 | 9:39 | 2 | 5 | 40.0 | 1 | 4 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -7 |
| Jordan Clarkson | G | 4 | 9:26 | 2 | 6 | 33.3 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 |
| Jose Alvarado | G | 2 | 12:00 | 1 | 3 | 33.3 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
Elite Bench Contributions from New York
The Knicks’ secondary unit didn’t just maintain the lead; they expanded it. Players like Jeremy Sochan and Miles McBride provided high-energy defense and timely buckets, ensuring no drop-off in intensity. Their ability to study bench player impact proved vital in resting the starters while keeping the scoreboard moving.
Chicago Bulls Player Stats
The Bulls faced a daunting task at the Garden and struggled to find consistent offensive flow. Despite some bright spots from the perimeter, the team couldn’t match New York’s physical presence inside or their defensive rotations.
| Player | POS | PTS | MIN | FGM | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | OREB | DREB | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | PF | +/- |
| Collin Sexton | G | 19 | 28:30 | 6 | 12 | 50.0 | 5 | 7 | 71.4 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -19 |
| L. Miller | F | 14 | 27:34 | 5 | 8 | 62.5 | 2 | 3 | 66.7 | 2 | 3 | 66.7 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -26 |
| Tre Jones | G | 13 | 25:51 | 4 | 5 | 80.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 5 | 8 | 62.5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | -12 |
| R. Dillingham | G | 13 | 17:01 | 1 | 4 | 25.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -7 |
| Matas Buzelis | F | 11 | 23:13 | 4 | 9 | 44.4 | 1 | 5 | 20.0 | 2 | 4 | 50.0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | -19 |
| L. Olbrich | F | 8 | 11:06 | 3 | 6 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 2 | 4 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| Josh Giddey | G | 7 | 25:40 | 3 | 12 | 25.0 | 0 | 4 | 0.0 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | -32 |
| Patrick Williams | F | 7 | 20:49 | 3 | 8 | 37.5 | 1 | 4 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -19 |
| Guerschon Y. | C | 5 | 24:42 | 2 | 9 | 22.2 | 1 | 6 | 16.7 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -27 |
| Isaac Okoro | F | 3 | 26:24 | 3 | 6 | 50.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | -40 |
| Yuki Kawamura | G | 3 | 4:35 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Mac McClung | G | 0 | 4:35 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Resilient Bench Effort from Chicago
While the starters struggled, the Bulls’ bench provided a necessary spark to keep the game from becoming a complete shutout. Collin Sexton’s shooting from deep was a rare highlight, showing that Chicago’s depth can be productive when checking team scoring depth even in a lopsided loss.
Knicks vs Bulls Match Stats Comparison
| Stat Category | Chicago Bulls | New York Knicks |
| Field Goals | 35-81 (43.2%) | 48-91 (52.7%) |
| 3-Pointers | 11-35 (31.4%) | 15-39 (38.5%) |
| Free Throws | 15-26 (57.7%) | 25-28 (89.3%) |
| Total Rebounds | 42 | 54 |
| Assists | 24 | 30 |
| Steals | 4 | 11 |
| Blocks | 6 | 3 |
| Turnovers | 16 | 8 |
| Points in Paint | 32 | 44 |
| Final Score | 96 | 136 |
The statistical gap between these two teams was most evident in the shooting percentages and turnover battle. New York shot a blistering 52.7% from the field and capitalized on Chicago’s 16 turnovers to secure a 40-point victory. Their dominance on the glass with 54 total rebounds further cemented their control over the tempo and flow of the game.
Injury Report
| Team | Player | Position | Status | Injury | Expected Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NY | Karl-Anthony Towns | C | Day-To-Day | Elbow | 2026-04-06 |
| CHI | Nick Richards | C | Out | Elbow – Sprain | 2026-04-05 |
| CHI | Anfernee Simons | G | Out | Wrist – Fracture | 2026-04-05 |
| CHI | Jalen Smith | F | Out | Calf – Strain | 2026-10-01 |
| CHI | Zach Collins | F | Out | Toe – Surgery | 2026-10-01 |
| CHI | Noa Essengue | F | Out | Shoulder – Surgery | 2026-10-01 |
knicks vs Chicago Bulls Match PDF Detail
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score of the Knicks vs Bulls game?
The New York Knicks defeated the Chicago Bulls with a dominant final score of 136-96 at Madison Square Garden on April 3rd, 2026.
Who was the top scorer for the New York Knicks?
OG Anunoby led the Knicks in scoring with 31 points, shooting an impressive 7-of-10 from the three-point line during the victory.
How did Jalen Brunson perform in the match?
Jalen Brunson finished the game with 17 points and a team-high 10 assists, effectively orchestrating the Knicks’ offense throughout his 29 minutes on the court.
Which Bulls player had the most points?
Collin Sexton was the leading scorer for the Chicago Bulls, coming off the bench to provide 19 points, including five successful three-pointers.
Where was the Knicks vs Chicago Bulls match played?
The game took place at the iconic Madison Square Garden in New York, NY, with an official attendance of 19,812 fans.
Did Karl-Anthony Towns play in this game?
No, Karl-Anthony Towns did not play in this game against the Chicago Bulls due to an injury/illness (DND).
What was the key factor in New York’s victory?
The Knicks’ superior shooting (52.7% FG) and their ability to protect the ball (only 8 turnovers) were the primary factors in their 40-point win.
Final Thoughts
This 136-96 victory for the Knicks sends a loud message to the rest of the league about their offensive capabilities. With OG Anunoby and Jalen Brunson leading a balanced attack, New York proved why they are a force to be reckoned with at home. For the Bulls, this game serves as a learning experience to tighten their defense and improve ball security before their next outing.
